Don’t Fool Yourself

2024-08-28 Wed

Rick Gilmore

Prelude

(kylecrazyford, 2009)

(Styx-Topic, 2018)

Overview

Announcements

Last time…

Today

Don’t Fool Yourself

Don’t Fool Yourself

(NYU Health Sciences Library, 2013)

Richard Feynmann

Richard Feynmann

Feynmann on “Cargo Cult” science

Richard Feynmann

In the South Seas there is a Cargo Cult of people. During the war they saw airplanes land with lots of good materials, and they want the same thing to happen now…

(Feynman, 1974)

…So they’ve arranged to make things like runways, to put fires along the sides of the runways, to make a wooden hut for a man to sit in with two wooden pieces on his head like headphones and bars of bamboo sticking out like antennas—he’s the controller—and they wait for the airplanes to land…

(Feynman, 1974)

They’re doing everything right. The form is perfect. It looks exactly the way it looked before. But it doesn’t work. No airplanes land. So I call these things Cargo Cult Science, because they follow all the apparent precepts and forms of scientific investigation, but they’re missing something essential, because the planes don’t land…

(Feynman, 1974)

What’s the point?

  • Why does Feynmann call this sort of behavior a “cult”

Richard Feynmann

…the idea that we all hope you have learned in studying science in school…It’s a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty…

(Feynman, 1974)

Have you learned about this principle of ‘utter honesty’ by studying science in school? If so, how?

Richard Feynmann

The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool. So you have to be very careful about that. After you’ve not fooled yourself, it’s easy not to fool other scientists…

(Feynman, 1974)

Why does Feynmann warn us about fooling ourselves?

  • Are we the easiest to fool? Why or why not?

…a specific, extra type of integrity that is not lying, but bending over backwards to show how you’re maybe wrong, that you ought to do when acting as a scientist. And this is our responsibility as scientists, certainly to other scientists, and I think to laymen.

(Feynman, 1974)

…If you’ve made up your mind to test a theory, or you want to explain some idea, you should always decide to publish it whichever way it comes out. If we only publish results of a certain kind, we can make the argument look good. We must publish both kinds of result.

(Feynman, 1974)

…if you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid–not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you’ve eliminated by some other experiment…

(Feynman, 1974)

Other kinds of errors are more characteristic of poor science. When I was at Cornell. I often talked to the people in the psychology department. One of the students told me she wanted to do an experiment that went something like this—I don’t remember it in detail, but it had been found by others that under certain circumstances, X, rats did something, A…

(Feynman, 1974)

…She was curious as to whether, if she changed the circumstances to Y, they would still do, A. So her proposal was to do the experiment under circumstances Y and see if they still did A. I explained to her that it was necessary first to repeat in her laboratory the experiment of the other person—to do it under condition X to see if she could also get result A…

(Feynman, 1974)

…and then change to Y and see if A changed. Then she would know that the real difference was the thing she thought she had under control. She was very delighted with this new idea, and went to her professor. And his reply was, no, you cannot do that, because the experiment has already been done and you would be wasting time…

(Feynman, 1974)

…This was in about 1935 or so, and it seems to have been the general policy then to not try to repeat psychological experiments, but only to change the conditions and see what happens.

(Feynman, 1974)

Do psychologists routinely repeat psychological experiments today?

  • Why or why not?

…So I have just one wish for you—the good luck to be somewhere where you are free to maintain the kind of integrity I have described, and where you do not feel forced by a need to maintain your position in the organization…or financial support, or so on, to lose your integrity. May you have that freedom.

(Feynman, 1974)

Questions about Feynmann’s speech

  • What pressures can act on scientists to push them away from Feynmann’s ideas about ‘integrity’?
  • Do you agree or disagree with Feynman’s characterizations of poor science? Why or why not?
  • Are Feynman’s ‘rules’ or principles about science taught explicitly? Where and how? If not, why not?

Next time

How to read a scientific paper

Resources

References

PSYCH 490.012 • Fall 2024

Carey, M. A., Steiner, K. L., & Petri, W. A., Jr. (2020). Ten simple rules for reading a scientific paper. PLoS Computational Biology, 16(7), e1008032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008032
Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science. https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm. Retrieved from https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.htm
kylecrazyford. (2009, December). Simon & garfunkel - kathy’s song. Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXZyDtzDJMY
NYU Health Sciences Library. (2013, November). Data sharing and management snafu in 3 short acts (higher quality). Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66oNv_DJuPc
Ruben, A. (2016). How to read a scientific paper. Science| AAAS [Internet], 20. Retrieved from https://www.science.org/content/article/how-read-scientific-paper-rev2
Sagan, C. (1996). The Demon-haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark (pp. 200–218). Ballantine Books.
Styx-Topic. (2018, July). Fooling yourself (the angry young man). Youtube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apTy_Wez4V4